| Author |
 Topic  |
|
CMx2
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/02/2007 : 01:45:53 AM
|
I'm very familiar with National Geographic. Its a fine magazine. Thanks to my Grandparent's subscription going back to the 60s, I've read literally hundreds of issues.
The one thing I seemed to have missed is all the pictures of naked men in huts walking around with erections. Maybe I missed an issue.
This response is pretty typical though. The pro-boner people can't defend their made up "facts" when confronted, so instead try to deflect the issues.
In this case, you can witness the less-than-subtle insults and more misleading comments.
Go back through this thread (and others) and you'll notice this is something that happens over and over with these people.
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 210 |
 |
|
|
StuffedTiger
Forum Member
|
 Posted - 01/02/2007 : 03:09:06 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
... You have to know that if I seen a man gawking in the showers at people while fully erect and playing with himself I would be the first one there escorting that as*h*le to his car by his ear lobe while dialing 911. ...
Good for you.
quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
... People have to learn to distinguish between a natural and unwanted erection and one that is intentional is all I am ever saying. ...
And a good way to do that is for the male to cover up or sit down as soon as feasible. That tells everyone it is natural and unwanted and not one that is intentional. Simple.
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 246 |
|
|
|
StuffedTiger
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/02/2007 : 03:51:05 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
... 99.9% of any nodist media or internet site is all pictures of women and if not women then little girls! ...
Aw, gee. There you go, making fun of us nodists. Aren't you clever. BTW, did you even think to go to the nudist pictures on THIS SITE. Are you that stopid??? You did not even think to look that far??? What a jerk you are. quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
... I'm serious. Go to alt.binaries.pictures.nudism.youth.and.families and ...
Yes, you are serious. You know full well, or ought to, that that is not a nudist website. It is not even a website. It is a Usenet binary news group. Anyone from anywhere in the world can post anything they want to to that news group. You have a nerve sending people to that group. They need the correct software so that they don't download anything but headers until they know how to avoid the troll trash. Are you trying to push porn on us? Is that what this whole thing is about? Or are you trying to entrap people.
quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
... You guys can have this argument that erections are to be hidden. That's fine with me, but never; and I mean never try to convince anyone that nudism isn't about sex when women are the focus of most every nudist picture site I have ever seen. ...
That just proves the point that you are no nudist, have never researched nudism in the least and, until now, have never even talked with nudists.quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
If you don't think I'm correct, I will bow down and never say a word again, but prove it. Show me a family nudist site where the majority of the pictures shown aren't women. Not only women, but women posing for the camera in provocitive ways.
Well, again, you might start with this website. Then you might try the HUNDREDs of real nudist sites linked from www.AANR.com and www.NaturistSociety.com. And that is just North America. There is www.INF-FNI.com and just as many for England, France, Germany, Australia and on and on. Nobody is asking you to eat humble pie, just stop being such a hypocrite. You can't not even know of the AANR and think you can fool the people here into believing the huffing, bluffing and puffing pack of lies you continue to spew out.
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 246 |
|
|
|
lil_lilly_nudist
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/02/2007 : 05:12:13 AM
|
If a guy has an erection then thats not sexual cos my exbf said just seeing a pretty girls face can give erections. Face isnt sex.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 21 |
|
|
|
CMx2
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/02/2007 : 06:58:54 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by lil_lilly_nudist
If a guy has an erection then thats not sexual cos my exbf said just seeing a pretty girls face can give erections. Face isnt sex.
I have to say thats a good an argument as anyone else has put forward in this thread!
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 210 |
|
|
|
HarborGuy
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/02/2007 : 10:14:02 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by StuffedTiger
quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
... 99.9% of any nodist media or internet site is all pictures of women and if not women then little girls! ...
Aw, gee. There you go, making fun of us nodists. Aren't you clever. BTW, did you even think to go to the nudist pictures on THIS SITE. Are you that stopid??? You did not even think to look that far??? What a jerk you are. [quote]Originally posted by HarborGuy
The fact is that I didn't even know or consider that this site had pictures. I thought it was just conversation threads and that's all I was interested in when I joined. I don't normally go looking for pictures. If I want to see nude people, I don't have to go looking for them. All I have to do is walk out my door and I can see nothing but nude people. In fact I have no choice, but to see nude people while working and helping to run a nudist resort.
As part of my job though I have had to advertise the resort and in some cases and just in case you didn't know a resort or any business has to use other pictures that really weren't taken at that place being advertised because the people depicted have to sign a release. Some nudists don't want to have their pictures taken and that's why nudist places have a rule that no cameras or video phones are allowed in the parks.
Pictures that are already posted in say news groups are exempt from that spacific law so they can be used in advertisement freely. Especially pictures obviously taken over seven years ago.
I understand how this is a hot button topic, but please people the relax. It can steem up emotions and cause both sides to throw stones including me. We don't have to resort to name calling and hate. We're all adults in here so and we all can make are cases as such.
"Aw, gee. There you go, making fun of us nodists. Aren't you clever. BTW, did you even think to go to the nudist pictures on THIS SITE. Are you that stopid??? You did not even think to look that far??? What a jerk you are."
I understand how in the heat of a spacific topic tempers can rise and we might say things and only prove the opposite to what we are trying to get across, (Such as in the quote above) so just relax and make your opinions as responsible adults please.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
Saxman
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 12:02:25 AM
|
That's a great point, Lilly! Etiquette and hormones must mix, and it's not often easy to do so. What you said is absolutely true! However, following the "guidlines" is proper. I definitely like your argument because it's very accurate!
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 114 |
|
|
|
StuffedTiger
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 01:55:53 AM
|
quote:
Originally posted by HarborGuy
[quote] ... Pictures that are already posted in say news groups are exempt from that spacific law so they can be used in advertisement freely. Especially pictures obviously taken over seven years ago. ...
No they can't. Anybody in advertising would know that. Oh, wait, you just make these things up as you go, don't you. Is there even one shred of truth in anything you have said?
|
|
Country:
| Posts: 246 |
|
|
|
CMx2
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 08:20:33 AM
|
StuffedTiger, you're making the same mistake I've made.
You should never direct comments directly at the pro-boner people. Its a lose-lose situation because they wil never ever yield their position.
They don't care about facts.
They don't care about etiquette.
They care about one thing: Acceptance of public erections.
Because to the vast majority of them, nudity equals sex.
They will do whatever they can to make is possible to walk around sporting their boners for all to see.
|
Edited by - CMx2 on 01/03/2007 08:26:07 AM |
|
Country:
| Posts: 210 |
|
|
|
HarborGuy
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 10:00:08 AM
|
Things that are not copyrighted and were already in circulation where the artist or author is unknown are considered common knowlege.
Here is a good place to research such laws. Of course this is only basic research imformation. Any further imformation would require me to upload an entire law library of case history. Or if failing that, a good old fashion debate in a court of law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism
People are free to research everything I say. I have no problem with that. Anyone who has spent more than a month in college will tell you that they had to take a critical thinking class it's a required subject, at least it was for me.
I, in fact admire a critical mind and welcome critical thinking. It would be a shame if we all followed blindly everything people say.
Even in Job's the bible tells you that. That's why you are encouraged to bring your bible to church so you can read along with the ministor and see that what he's telling you is true.
I never made up any fact. How do you make up a fact? A fact is a fact and making something up is fiction and using fiction to sway someone's opinion is a lie and a lie is a lie. Up is up, down is down, left is left and right is right. Calling me a liar is just slander.
Read my posts. If I ever said anything where I didn't have the facts I always said that it was my own opinion and nothing more. If you don't like my opinions, that's your choice, but I don't see the need for savage attacts on my educated and under oath ethics.
I really do hope that any new readers to this thread reads the whole string. I hope they read every post with a critical mind, that is what learning is all about.
However, If I have ever written anything that is wrong, please call me on it. I will be glad to research it and if I find that I was in error I will bow down to it and retract my statement with a public apology, but if I prove that I was correct, then I would of course expect the same from you.
This is getting pretty silly don't you think?
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 74 |
|
|
|
AussieMatt
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 5:58:24 PM
|
I had the good fortune to spend the weekend at an Australian nudist resort which was neither a swinging haven nor a prudist nudist collection.
One couple was rather amorous and so far as the other 28 guests were concerned, good for them. There was a mature mindset operating where people were allowed to be adults instead of being squished beneath the fanatical puritanism which seems evident in so many here.
My point this whole time is not to promote men walking around with erections but to put human behaviour in perspective. No canoodling in public is like a strict schoolyard, or a Victorian nostalgia convention.
But plenty of people on this website seem to equate the normal and expected behaviour of groups of adults, ie out of the group a few people will be feeling romantic and show it, with swinging and moral degeneracy.
This bitter little wowserism puts me off social nudism, but like I said, I had the good fortune to find a wonderful place which was neither sleazy nor puckeringly prim and proper.
|
|
Country: Australia
| Posts: 20 |
|
|
|
allnaturalwife
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 6:42:51 PM
|
Wow. This topic is still going on as popular as ever. Well..if the "pro erection" crowd wins let me know, so I can make sure you all are not walking around at MY club waving those things at my twelve year old daughter.
Jennifer
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 689 |
|
|
|
AussieMatt
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 7:05:19 PM
|
Here we go again. Straight back to bone-headed simplistic drivel. I have a daughter, too, and I won't take her to a nudist resort because I can see no reason why pedophiles (whether tumescent or otherwise) wouldn't infiltrate any location where children are naked. But that's beside the point. What is the point?
|
|
Country: Australia
| Posts: 20 |
|
|
|
beachnudist
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 9:21:26 PM
|
Its protecting the kids from the pedophiles that is the important thing. That is the case no matter where you are. Remember that you more than likely meet pedophiles and sex abusers every day in the street, in the workplace, on the sportsfields, in shops, diners, schools, bars, churches, in our own streets and sometimes in our own homes and among our friends and relations and we do not know them for what they are. I do not think that a child is more likely to fall victim to a pedophile in a nudist situation any more than in any other. I would think that it would be less likely due to the fact that parents and others are apt to be more vigilant there than in most of the other situations that I have mentioned.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 132 |
|
|
|
beachnudist
Forum Member
|
Posted - 01/03/2007 : 9:33:22 PM
|
Nearly forgot,-- as for the never ending erection debate. I think at this stage everybody knows what is polite and what is not. If you choose to be impolite then you know what sort of reaction to expect. Its not much to ask of anybody to show a little respect to those around them by behaving in a decent manner.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 132 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nudist-Resorts.Org Discussion Forum Bulletin Board Nudism Clothing Optional Resort Naturism Nude Beaches |
© 2002-2020 SUN |
|
|
|
A simple question? Arousal and etiquette...
