| Author |
 Topic  |
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
 Posted - 05/28/2011 : 06:53:38 AM
|
First you called me immoral. Nice going!!!! Now this. Oh, I get it, I'm immoral because I don't like states who target civilians in committing war crimes, especially against children and infants who can't make very big fists.
I'm not going to lend your obnoxious words even a vestigial bit of dignity, that are foreign to America and good conversational taste, to dominate this discussion. Your attachment is disportionally for Israel, as you defend all its crimes against humanity, and even two attacks against America. As for me, I'll always be against any nation who uses its military hardware against us, Israrel or not.
So, love Palin all you want. She is a war hawk who gave up her office because she could not handle it. Love Bachmann who thinks America is God's gift to Israel and that we are on a divine mission to help it expand its borders.
The GOP is fake, through and through, and it has not one statesman, save for Paul who is really a libertarian. Goldwater and Ike would walk away from this party - their kids have. No GOP giants, nobody to speak of.
Your main statemental problem is that you cannot tell the difference between philosophy, whicn I am given to, and militaristic GOP rhetoric, which your statements espouse.
Your pathetic statements on who neocons are, and how many neocons there are, such as in the latter Bush Administration, makes your statements look like they are straight of a neocon basic training camp. You become very angry because I happen to know a lot about the neocon ilk. You might want to learn about them in great detail by going to youtube.com and typing neo-conned +ron paul into their search text box.
So, as before, you resort to more name calling by clever technical dialectics, that can only be rivalled by Clinton's wordsmithing and parsing, just remember that 100% of my loyalty goes to America, unlike Palin and her advocacy of internation crimes to expand Israel's borders, Giuliani (with his office in Israel while he was mayor), and delusional Bachmann. Is there an approved candidate who will ignore the will of our speciall ally. Nope, except for Ron Paul. Watch them all flock to give speeches at AIPAC, except of Ron Paul.
When you can stop the peurile name calling, let me know. I don't discuss things with a strong advocate for war just because Palin or McCain want to have one. How anti-Madison can your statements get? My goodness.
Go on, wave your statemental pom-poms for more war for Israel. Richard Perle demands it from all good, obedient Republicans. Just read his words. Some folks refuse to learn, and I'm not one of them.
"The spirit of this country is totally adverse to a large military force." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
 |
|
|
balataf
Forum Member
|
Posted - 05/28/2011 : 12:53:39 PM
|
Please give me any example where I defended a "crime against humanity."
When Hamas hit a schoolbus with an antitank round, killing a kid, doesn't Israel have a right to defend itself? Which item is a crime?
You falsely accuse me of being a Palin supporter when I have specified three times in this thread that I am not. You are ignoring that I specified several times that she and Bachmann are not worth voting for. Once again you totally ignored what I really did say.
I specified that I did not call you any name only pointing out your possible choices. You seem to have confirmed me, yet again.
There is no example in this entire discussion in which I advocated going to war for Israel. Look it over: there is none. You completely invented that item out of nothing.
Where did I ever defend "attacks against America?" That's rampantly delusional Show me any example!
The vast majority of your attacks against everyone, inclding myself, are sgsinst points that are unreal and not very functional. Like ignoring facts that Jefferson went into opposition against the Hamilton and Washington Federalist Party. Or that Franklin, as President of Pennsylvania, when he died, was following a Federalist-style policy. To you, the Hamilton half of the "Founding Fathers" don't count. Maybe they were "fake Americans, too?"
Ron Paul will likely severely limit himself by too much rigidity, so that on issues, he will be unable to coordinate with other factions.
Both Republicans and Democrats are each about 43% of Americans. You cannot build a winning coalition out of 20% of 45% alone.
|
Edited by - balataf on 05/28/2011 12:54:09 PM |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 05/29/2011 : 02:27:31 AM
|
To the audience in general; not to Balataf.
Here is a quite a video for vets. John Fonda McCain exposed in his own words. Phew, you'll need fresh air after viewing this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdEQ8DEzUVk&feature=player_embedded
"The spirit of this country is totally adverse to a large military force." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 05/29/2011 : 11:53:33 PM
|
On this Memorial Day, we need to remember this -- our US Navy was deliberately, intentionally, and knowingly attacked by a Mideastern nation.
The men on the USS Liberty, the attacked ship, were all heroes, yet they were abandoned by America. They were even denied their right to build a memorial for this horrific event. The squashing of a memorial for them was by the very nation that attacked the USA.
A veteran's newsletter makes mention of this event.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/05/29/remember-the-u-s-s-liberty-and-crew-this-memorial-day/" target="_blank"> br / http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/05/29/remember-the-u-s-s-liberty-and-crew-this-memorial-day/
If the website address shows as a double one, just click on the bottom part of it. Just in case.
Here is a video of an analysis of this attack on the USA's Navy. Your heart wants to go out to these sailors when you see this. Never before have our sailors had treason committed on them by an American president, a cowardly president who cared more about re-election than he did in trying to save these men's life. In fact, he ordered that their lives be ended to protect the enemy who attacked them, so that, in part, they in turn would give money to his campaign.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4113285887114591367#
The same nation that did this to us, now is in charge of our nuclear security, and they keep records of our nation's phone calls, as was mentioned on Fox News by Carl Cameron.
The new style Tea Party leaders have no problem with this attack. I think there is something funny about the "tea" they are drinking, and it's not jasmine tea. Maybe a strange herbal tea. By all this, I don't mean the Tea Party rank and file, but just the new batch of wannage leaders like Michelle Bachmann, the strange, illusional politician, who thinks our nation exists, to a large degree, to serve the nation that attacked us.
I can't beat that for a plan to make our country suicidal. She has me purely outclassed o that singular end. You don't go, girl.
We need Ron Paul, instead, to help our country regain its "city on a shining hill" status, once again.
Please remember our military members who were killed in action, and those who were injured for life. Please oppose all unwise and dishonest use of our military that result from entangling alliances that mislead our purpose as a nation.
Thanks
"The spirit of this country is totally adverse to a large military force." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
balataf
Forum Member
|
Posted - 05/30/2011 : 01:42:00 AM
|
I am very opposed to Bachmann every getting close to control of the nuclear trigger, as I have said.
Like most of the Tea Party and just about all of the Christian Right, she is a strong supporter of Israel.
But the charge that she is SUBSERVIENT to Israel is not consistent with any speach or action of hers thAt I have ever seen. Anyone can support an issue, a group, a person or nation without losing their independent judgemen.
Just as political parties are coalitions of independent groups and factions, so, too is international politics made up of coalitions of independent actors who choose to increase their power by coordinating with others. World War II was a great example, in which neither America nor Britain was bossing or controling the other.
This sad mistake reminds me of the American mistake made some years ago that downed an Iranian airliner thinking it was military, or the Soviet mistake in downing the Korean Air flight. In Viet Nam, I knew a Captain who had, in error, blown up an American tank with its' crew. In WW2 there were dozens, perhaps hundreds, of American aircraft hitting US or alied ships, and or ships killing aircraft.
As a deliberate attack, it appears not to pass the level of "reasonable doubt." I've seen several previous workups of this material. Very disturbing, but nowhere near proof.
Conser that we have trade and diplomatic work with Hanoi, and that there is no question of such an error there.
Why should this 44 YEAR AGO incident be a current question TODAY? Uncertainty, also, cannot rationally be twisted into pretending that I am defending the attack. If it becomes proven, there is no defense!
|
Edited by - balataf on 05/30/2011 02:07:05 AM |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
balataf
Forum Member
|
Posted - 05/30/2011 : 10:56:36 AM
|
I am reminded of my early times in political work. While I had been observing and analyzing politics since age 3, when the Korean War started, my first active campaign was in 1963, when Arlen Specter was running for District Attorney in Philadelphia.
But, the next spring was a presidential season. Following my Parents' lead, I supported and worked to elect Gov. William Scranton. Our greatest opposition was the rather radicalized coalition supporting Goldwater. Like Palin and Bachman, his strongest adherents were within what today we call the Christian Right.
Goldwater was for States' Rights, but was not. himself, a racist or segregationist. However, they were the other main pillar of his support, so that he carried only his home of Arizona, plus Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia and South Carolina. Having racists in his coalition did not imply that he was one. And, instead of Republicans, they were crossover Democrats.
At this point, the group who later became Neocons, were all Demolcrats. But this set up some of the fierce rivalry of Christian Right against them.
But the Goldwater campaign, and he, himself, did not give themselves the flexibility to bid for support from the half-dozen other Republican factions. McGovern did the same eight years later for the Democrats.
I am afraid that the current. expanded. Christian Right would be likely to perform similarly by nominating a candidate who could not unite all the major groups within the Party. I would hate to see Obama get the type of overwhelming vote that LBJ got in 1964, or that Nixon did in 1972.
I have elsewhere, already posted the story of the actions against my Wife and myself within the 1972 Watergate "Dirty Tricks" scandals.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
balataf
Forum Member
|
Posted - 06/26/2011 : 1:32:58 PM
|
There appears to be a certain opinion, without actually so stating, that the Republicans are playing some sort of grand budget game for petty or partisan advantage.
Have they been asleep the last few years?
While the current impending disaster has awakened a desperate last-ditch attempt to rescue the nation, these Democrats seem primarily concerned with secondary details. While certainly having great impact on many families, their relative impact is minor IF YOU COMPARE THEM TO IMPENDING NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY.
These actions have been sparked by decades of similar bi-partisan and pigheaded blindness as This attitude disoplays.
Now it is action time to correct our problems. We can't afford "business as usual."
That, in turn implies that we need to form a coalition to unite the various assorted groups snd types of voters who can submerge their disagreements within what they can agree on. Otherwise we get Obbama again, even stronger, for FOUR MORE YEARS.
There are dozens of issues, which meqns hundreds of viewpoints within Republicans alone, not to mention needing Independents and concerned Democrats to win.
If a voter cares more about their pet preojects, like for-or-against Gy Marriage, or for-or-against Abortion, etc. etc., then it may make sense to vote third-party. But it is the tendency to form two huge squishy groups that pull in opposite directions that have continually evolved til today. Ever since most of the Founding Fathers grouped around Hamilton in Washington's Administration until Jefferson went into opposition,.
One side goes thru sich leaders as
Fed./Wh./Rep vs Democrat
Hamilton Vs Jefferson
Clay Vs Jackson
Lincoln Vs Douglas
T.Roosevelt Vs Bryan
Dewey VS F.D. Roosevelt
Nixon Vs McGovern
Reagan Vs Carter
"Dubya" Vs Gore
This process ocurrs again each 4-year term as the voters within their parties decide on the next leaders with their new policy proposals.
The Democrats no longer stand for "free coinage of silver at a weight ratio of 16 to gold money: yet that was basic Party doctrine from 1896 to 1908.
Backing state against Federal power has reversed party polarity 17 times in our history.
During the Wqar of 1812, the Democrats followed a sharply Federalist policy while the Federalist Party strongly embraced States Rights.
There is no area of policy in which the parties have not reversed themselves several times, as the voters who own them reshuffle on new issues.
One great example: Many who want States to control Abortion want Gay Marriage under Federal control and the opposite. Maybe we should have a compromise and give them both one way or the other.
|
Edited by - balataf on 06/26/2011 2:33:13 PM |
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 06/27/2011 : 07:01:13 AM
|
Tea Party would-be snatchers have a little problem as of late. Palin and Bachmann are those who would bend the party to their shrill way of thinking, or in case of these two politicians, capitulating to foreign interests.
It's difficult to contemplate the very essence of any tea party, without having a strong element of freedom attached to it. Surpression of the rights of man and cruelty to man is hardly the stuff of a tea party, but it is the stuff of Palin and Bachmann.
Once seen as fresh and welcome faces to a tired field of establishment types, they have become the darlings of the establishment. They put on the facade of being leaders or willing leaders of the Tea Party, and it they have become the latter, this Tea Party is a tea party in name only.
My kind of Tea Party is the banishment of human servitude, slavery to foreign interests (especially when they hurt America), enhancing the independence of America, and being an example for the world to emulate. Not so, with Bachmann and Palin. One can wish this were not so.
This month, the spirit of the original Tea Party will come into play, but not here. Rather it will be overseas, and I'm sure the likes of Jefferson and Franklin would enthusiastically support this new event. It's called the "Flotilla," and brings with it, relief for the oppressed, if the oppressors are civilized enough to let this aid go through.
It takes a Stalin or Hitler to deny people their basic human needs, and we will see the spirits of these two stop this act of charity. Naturally, charity is one of the most worthy of American values. Who are these new Hitlers or Stalins who inveight against Americanism?
As usual, the state that wants the continuation of the deprivations of these victims, issue their usual sterile hysteria, claiming that people who are charitable are extremists. We can expect this from an uncivilized state.
Let's see for ourselves. It is described in these articles. It may surprise you.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/26/israel-accused-gaza-flotilla-journalists
http://www.freedomflotilla.eu/en/information/3-freedomflotilla-announcements/131-press-release-qsailing-to-gazaq
Meanwhile, the USA, weak, obsequious to a foreign power, and in deep servitude to it, issued this mindless warning:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/24/us-israel-usa-flotilla-idUSTRE75N4A620110624
Naturally, the Tea Party queens dislike any Christian charity for an oppressed people. No doubt they applaud, most dutifully, any attempt to stop delivering human dignity to a people in a desperate situation. Palin and Bachmann are no Christians, but rather zombies who are easily controlled by a foreign power. No patriots or real tea party folks are they.
The American people have much to learn.
"How far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without?"
Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 06/30/2011 : 03:29:53 AM
|
Analysis of the Anti-Tea Party. This tea party you want the cargo arrive safely and help one of the world's most oppressed people. It is fitting on the upcoming Independence Day weekend that this flotilla make it through these sick pirates who would and will willingly, and very intentionally make a whole people suffer for no reason at all, except that their oppressors are narcissistic, and otherwise mentally ill.
Oddly enough, the ones who do not want to participate in their government's oppression of a helpless people (and these "refuseniks" are actually mentally healthy) are put into mental hospitals to help these intelligent folks recover from their normal human instincts. The Soviet Union did the same thing. Palin and Bachmann support this type of upside down thinking. They would have made good Soviet enforcment officers, but not purveyors of the American way of life. Shrill statement? Not really based on nothing more than the facts.
So, let's see the latest op-ed on America's opposition to freedom. America is currently, and has been for decades, too weak and timid to not support in spirit the desire to have freedom for others in the Mideast. Instead America wants suffering made possible by an "ally," if one can believe that ally label for these oppressors.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/27/breaching-gazas-siege-update/" target="_blank"> br / http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/06/27/breaching-gazas-siege-update/
Click on the bottom half of this link if it appears to be a double link. Thanks.
"How far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without?"
Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
balataf
Forum Member
|
Posted - 07/01/2011 : 6:03:38 PM
|
Texas Gov. Perry may run for Presient. He is well positioned and has support across most factions of the Republican Party. He is acceptable to the Establishment Republicans, and, like Palin and Bachmann, he was instrumenta; in helping various independent groups to organize the Tea Party.
One problem is that Perry never had a good relationship with "Dubya."
After the Legislature and elected State Cabinet, Perry spent 6 years as Lt. Gov., and has been Governor of the second largest state since 2000. During this decade, in which
he was re-elected twice.
His leadership has helped Texas to compile the best economic record of all states.
But, as Governor, he has not had any experience in foreign policy. "Dubya" solved this, recycling people, like Abrams, Wolfowitz, and others from the basic Reagan team.
It is worthwhile seeing who he would rely on during the campaign.
Obama is being widely criticized by many for "tilting" too much in favor of the Arabs in current policy debates. Yet he got 80% of the Jewish vote in 2008.
Looking thru the comments posted in various political blogs such as those attached to "Real Clear Politics," there appears to be a comparative collapse of postings favorable to Obama. This is my impression, without an exhaustive counting. Where it had been about 60% anti-O, 30% pro-O, and 10% fairly neutal, this has shifted to 80% anti-O, 15% pro-O amd 5% in between. If this trend continues, it will be very indicative. The volume of comments remains extremely high, as it has been since the formation of the Tea Party groups. The 2012 vote is likely to be similar to 2010.
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 07/02/2011 : 03:24:27 AM
|
Independence Day is near, for Americans, but some people are under some of the worst oppression in the history of mankind. We, the American people are taking an active part in this oppression.
How so, you ask? You can find the answer on your IRS form. You pay for this 60+ years of this oppression and you did not know it. Where is that American desire for freedom in the Mideast? It's non-existant, except in the "minds" of the neoconservative gang, and that of their acolytes.
The Anti-Tea-Party is under way, despite all the intimidations of that nation which is providing the oppression. The bullying intimidators will fail in this mission of supreme humanity to a suffering people. The reason for the dubbing of this action as the Anti-Tea Party is that good and moral people want the precious cargo to get through, without it being dumped into the sea or stolen by the oppressors.
The attempt at lifting the brutal siege will accomplished by some Americans, and people of other nations. Included in the passenger list of this flotilla is a Holocaust survivor who knows what oppression and debasement of humanity is all about.
The county that oppresses is our "special ally." It will use force to stop the rescue ships, and will have the support of every weak and servile American elected official. These can be found in both major parties. Fear of our special ally is what makes them do it.
While the flotilla will not make it through to these suffering people, an entirely differnt kind of victory will be scored against the oppressor. That is, another dose of isolation and resentment of our ally by the world, except America - we're bought and paid for.
As might be remembered from the last flotilla, our special ally murdered quite a few unarmed flotilla crew. This earned the contempt of the world given to our special ally. Of course, America has no contempt or common sense. We're not allowed to.
Here is an article from the offending country's major newspaper. Seems that the contrbutor to this newspaper is much more aware of the PR problem our special ally will have soon enough than we Americans are. We can thank our media for that. Here is the link:
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/israel-has-become-a-society-of-force-and-violence-1.370407
It is difficult to plumb the depths of inhumanity of those who are in favor of oppressing these helpless and hapless people, and of wanting the flotilla's shipment of vital food and medicine to not get through to these desperate people. Yet, they exist.
I wonder how much novacaine for the conscience it takes to numb one's conscience to these facts. Apparently there are enough anti-moral sentiments to make that happen. It's good to live with a clear conscience on matters like these.
But, how does this affect the average American? It affect us plenty. Our foreign policies and the lives of our military men and woman are at risk. We have spent trillions of dollars because of this type of action overseas. We are seen as the enablers of human suffering, and we have made more enemies than we thought possible, thanks to the hijacking of our nation's outlook toward the world.
The phony war on terrorism and the real one on our US Constitution comes from this oppressor's influence, which every elected official knows to be the case. They just will not speak of it. If this were the real America, we would have contributed to the humanitarian relief of these oppressed people. Instead we have the America of the neoconservatives, and their lust for war and hegemony. It will be a very long time when we can restore our republic. The current crop of candidates are going to give us more Bush and Obama, save for Ron Paul, the designated thinker of politics.
The spirit of this flotilla has a lot to do with the American spirit and our liberty. If it succeeds, we will be safer. It if fails, we will take partial blame for it. The choice could not be more clear regarding this flotilla. American politicians could not be more cowardly.
"How far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without?"
Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
balataf
Forum Member
|
Posted - 07/02/2011 : 4:31:28 PM
|
Not So "Mickey Mouse" in Egypt
From PJM Media, but very widely reported internationally.
Bearded Mickey, veiled Minnie not so magic in the new Egypt
How’s that Arab Spring working out? Let’s see, everyone’s expecting the Islamists to grab a share of power, and the Obama administration is establishing official contact with them. If Egyptians speak out against the Islamists, even if they’re rich and powerful owners of tech industries, they can expect to face charges, boycotts and death threats for insulting Islam. Even if the “insult” is harmless in the extreme.
An Egyptian Christian telecom mogul has angered Islamic hard-liners by posting an online cartoon of Mickey Mouse with a beard and Minnie in a face veil.
The ultraconservative Islamists, known as Salafis, called the cartoon posted by Naguib Sawiris on Twitter a mockery of Islam. They launched an online campaign calling on Muslims in Egypt to boycott Sawiris’ mobile phone company Mobinil. Shares of Mobilnil and Orascom Telecom, which Sawiris founded, both fell Monday on the Egyptian stock exchange. …
Named “We are joking Sawiris,” the Facebook group said: “If you are really a Muslim, and you love your religion, boycott his projects. We have to cut out the tongue of any person who attacks our religion.”
At least 15 Salafi lawyers have filed lawsuits accusing Sawiris of religious contempt, an official at the prosecutor general office said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
Here’s the offending tweet. It’s far less offensive than the tasks Hamas tends to put its faux Mickey to. Apparently it’s cool to steal Mickey Mouse to teach Palestinian kids to be terrorists, not so cool to slap a beard on him to criticize the terrorists’ ideology
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 661 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 07/03/2011 : 12:10:13 AM
|
Here are some federal follies.
Turns out that presidential hopeful (and hopeless), Rick Santorum has just come out in favor of abolishing the first amendment. Sounds crazy, but it's true. He said that if a university doesn't see things his way, that university should have its federal funding cut off. How King Georgish (III) can you get. Yet, the less educated people will go for this travesty.
One thing a university should not do is be intimidated by Zionist toadies like Santorum. Naturally, Santorum is towing the line laid out by the neoconservatives. He can't think for himself, and later on may be embarrassed by his own words, if he isn't already. Sick Santorum, the non-American and typical neocon.
Joshua Trevino, a neoconservative G. W. Bush speech-writer has called for the murder of Americans, and the White House is fine with that. This came from
http://politicalcorrection.org/fpmatters/201106270014
Little Josh considers people who help the victims of cruelty to be nazis. That is quite twisted thinking, and it represents the twisted thinking of the average neoconservative. Sadly for the GOP, he represents the new style of thinking within that party. I.e., he is no real Republican, just another fake stemming from the old FDR and LBJ days - hardly GOP stuff. If there is any nazi around, it's what passes for the GOP these days -- not the GOP decades ago.
Meanwhile back at the neoconservative ranch, Romney made a trip to Israel in hopes of getting their leader's endorsement - not an American newspaper endorsement, or another GOP endorsement, but a foreigner's endorsement. Hmmm, I guess that is supposed to make sense. Maybe Romney is running for office over there. Might as well, because his loyalty lies there.
The two crazy folks from the current GOP field, Palin and Bachmann, keep on lockstepping with each other in absolute loyalty to a foreign state, with not much loyalty to America. Further, Palin is a known quitter in office when things get a little tough, and Bachmann doesn't think there is any way the USA could have existed before 1948, according to her very direct own words. Although Palin claims to be a Christian, she wears the symbols of another religion. That's fine, we all have to be who we are, but let's be honest about who we are, and quit hiding our true identities.
Cain cannot tell the difference between a foreign state and America. In his own words, he said so. I wonder if he ever checked with a map of the world, or ever read the history of the USA. Naw, I don't think so.
Newt Gingrich does not know the capital of a foreign state - one that dominates the USA. He keeps on insisting that we place our offices in the wrong city over there. I think he gets his geography lessons from Cain.
So, on the GOP side, there still remains one rational, sane guy -Ron Paul. He was right in 2008, and he is right today. Recent history has proven him right over and over. All the neocon darlings look like fools for the stands they took in 2008, when the GOP got clobbered. They could legally be called idiots if they repeat their blunders this time around. The only reason they won anything in 2010 was Obama, plain and simple. If Obama were a moderate, Boehner would be a minority leader today.
As for Obama, he's the lone candidate on his side of the fence - nothing of interest at this time. Romney would have been a more interesting candidate if he were the incumbent. He could debate himself, and it would be hard to foretell who would win that debate. Romney the liberal versus Romney the neoconservative. The sparks could fly.
The GOP has no conservative in this season. All neocons and one libertarian. It would be one big joke, were it not for the libertarian.
As for the Tea Party, it's on life support if it trends neocon. Josh Trevino is a Tea Party guy, but he is no conservative or libertarian. Just another advocate for anti-Americanism.
"How far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without?"
Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 07/03/2011 : 04:49:21 AM
|
More trouble is highlighted by these Internet items. The trouble manifests itself for two peoples - Americans and Palestinians. It is more indirect for the Americans, but the annotated behaviors foster more terrorism. One has to break free of the dominant media to sense this.
The first link is shocking, and would never be tolerated in your hometown. Yet Americans are partially responsible for the stoning of children in a distant land. The people throwing the stones are very crude semi-humans. How low are you if you're an "adult" and you throw stones at innocent children? Lower than pond scum. That is how any decent person would feel.
See for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usPd6pbzYI4
You'll notice that one girl's face has been marred by a facist, Zionist terrorist. Later in this film, you'll see a thug appear on the video who tries to block the filming of this video. Apparently, he was too uncomfortable being shown for who or really what he is. This reminds me of those good time guys, the Soviets. They didn't like anyone filmig them either. In that way, the two military-obsessed countries were alike.
Unfortunately, Americans are known by the victims as partly to blame for this activity. They fund it. Palin wants to see a lot more stoning of children, because she supports these activities of land intrusions and their consequences.
The Internet is a cool arrangement; information can finally be brought out, where before we never knew what was happening. The truth is a wonderful relief.
More on the reverse tea party. Israel has been doing their homework after their huge PR disaster in the 2010 flotilla. They have now posed threats and intimidations on countries that may lend support to the flotilla. Greece is one example. It is highly vulnerable because of its near-bankruptcy status. It cannot offend the money gods. It has to do what is not natural for them.
http://www.readersupportednews.org/opinion2/289-134/6464-at-sea-on-the-audacity-of-hope
They even have a facebook account. Technology at its best - global free speech.
The GOP has now targeted Americans on the flotilla, and is trying to get us used to the idea of killing Americans whose dissenting views are not in line with the violent neoconservatives. Between that and Sanctimonious Rick Santorum, who wants to abolish the First Amendment, we are losing our rights, where they do not agree with the Zionists. Palin and Bachmann are supreme examples of this new disregard for our US Constitution. So, it's speak your mind and get killed in America. Hey, wow there is something we can all hang our hat on.
Ron Paul looks better each moment by contrasting himself against the new, fake GOP, as it makes its mark in the history of anti-Americanism. I cannot think of any area of life and politics where he has been on the wrong side. His main flaw is that he reminds us of our unpleasant realities, if you count that as a flaw.
All the legalisms and micro-techicalities will never erase the facts of man's inhumanity to man. The latter is the bigger picture and is irrefutable. Killing people for their views and stoning children are inexcusable, and it would take a lowly beast to say otherwise. Yet, there are those people who are cheerleaders and pom-pom guys/gals who actually think these two activities are defensible.
The Palestianians are not all good guys, but the bulk of the inhumanity is on their opponent's side. The USA cannot revive their good-guy status until they have broken free from the heavy and even mandatory behavior imposed on our politicians and media. The USA could solve this tragic problem quickly, but is paralyzed by our special ally.
I know what Eisenhower would have thought, said, and would have done. The GOP does not have anyone who had his stature and world respect. Ron Paul would come very close, but he is not in the White House. The new, artificial GOP is clueless and will mindlessly subject America to more hatred, and thus a target of more terrorism. Where will our hext Eisenhower come from. I don't know, and that is to be regretted. America had adult leadership back then. We don't now - just obedient lapdogs.
"How far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without?"
Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
Warmskin
Forum Member
|
Posted - 07/04/2011 : 10:01:17 PM
|
On this, Independence Day, we should look back and pay tribute to those who declared the USA into existence, under the law of nations. While we think of the USA as having been born in the Constitutional Convention, it was really July 4, 1776. The problem than was to expel the British foreign troops, which we did. After the dust settled we began to set up a free nation. Interestingly enough, there is a micro-consitution in the last part of the Declaration.
There is no way this could have happened today. Just look at today's leaders, and you will find very few who have a high regard for individual liberty. It's all mandatory group behavior, and no longer the age of the individual.
Imagine Jefferson trying to build his magnificent Monticello home today. Environmental impact reports, county permits, property taxes, using 1040 income to help build it, and a whole slew of federal regulations that would have brought his new home construction to a halt. I've taken a tour through that marvelous quintessentially American home. It's worth the trip there.
If all of us could go back in time and live there, we would have been amazed at how free people were back then, of course with the horrible exception of slaves, and indentured servants. Want to build a house? No problem, just get the lumber after you have your property surveyed, and start building. Of course there were fewer people back then, and that helped. April 15th? What is that - -a holiday? Meant nothing back then. Imagine living in a time where no one ever heard of the 1040 form. Actually you could have experienced the same thing early on in the 20th century.
Sadly, Americans have allowed themselves to be sacrificed by eloquent spokesmen and liars about how wonderful things would be if the American people would turn part of their income over to the British King, ooops, I meant the federal government to make their lives so much better. Is it better yet? Got prosperity in some form? More nudism in the nation. No? Hmmm.
When we have lost so much, we need to hunker down and determine that the gov't will get no more money from us to conduct gratuitous wars, a huge unfunded welfare empire that does not address the improvement of the inner-self and the work ethic, and so many more categories that keep helping to bring this nation down to bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is terrible, but we may have to go there, and then drive the kind of thinking out of this land that made us bankrupt. If we keep the same list of malevolent politicians and think tanks around that led us to this point, then we will fail, and will deserve our fate. We will go back in time prior to 1215 AD (Magna Carta). That is not progress, but our politicians will tell you it is.
If we kick these leeches out, we will be poised to re-find our freedoms, and that will bring out the best of each individual. At that point we can re-instate the Declaration of Independence, not to mention our Constitution. Now that is worth shooting off fireworks for!!
"How far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without?"
Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
Country: USA
| Posts: 1964 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nudist-Resorts.Org Discussion Forum Bulletin Board Nudism Clothing Optional Resort Naturism Nude Beaches |
© 2002-2020 SUN |
|
|
|
Tea Party Ten Point Platform
