Nudist-Resorts.Org - Naturist Discussion Forum / Bulletin Board


Nudist-Resorts.Org - Naturist Discussion Forum / Bulletin Board
Username:
Password:
Save Password


Register
Forgot Password?

About Us | Active Topics | Active Polls | Site News | Nudist News | Online Users | Members | Destinations | N. A. I. R. | My Page | Search
[ Active Members: 0 | Anonymous Members: 0 | Guests: 432 ]  [ Total: 432 ]  [ Newest Member: dild0 ]
 All Forums
 Nudism and The Law
 Nudism and Children / The Law Concerning Children
 Are nudist or naturist videos of children legal?
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic |   Reply to Topic |   Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic: out of a job after leading her fifth-grade classes Topic Next Topic: just starting nude and with children
Page: of 5

Kimberly
Forum Member


Posted - 04/26/2004 :  06:50:53 AM  Show Profile  Send Kimberly a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
That is the best way Calmnude, and when your through with them, destroy the evidence!

Kim =^.^=



Country: Canada | Posts: 3235 Go to Top of Page

papabare
Forum Member


Posted - 04/27/2004 :  10:44:04 PM  Show Profile  Visit papabare's Homepage  Send papabare a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
I agree with you both. But objectionable parts can be (and in some cases HAVE been) the chest of a 3 year old female. Or someones backside. Its hard to take pictures of kids that dont show objectionable parts when almost every body part can be objectionable. But I do do as Calmnude sugested and use digital cameras. I go through anything that might be questionable and either crop em to be unquestionable or just nuke em. I would rather have faint memeroies of my childrens early years, then years in jail cause someone didnt understand our value system and our morals and called the cops

In my view, better safe then sorry. I would love to have to NOT think like that but I have seen too many peoples lives get messed up because someone thought they were helping

--------------------
Live Body Proud, Live Clothes Free



Country: USA | Posts: 620 Go to Top of Page

Kimberly
Forum Member


Posted - 04/28/2004 :  04:09:16 AM  Show Profile  Send Kimberly a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
Does anyone rember the coppertone ad where the doggy is pulling down the little girls bathing suit bottom? I understand that the woman who was a little girl at the time she modled for that painting is suing!

Kim =^.^=



Country: Canada | Posts: 3235 Go to Top of Page

vealj
Forum Member


Posted - 04/28/2004 :  10:39:05 AM  Show Profile  Visit vealj's Homepage  Send vealj an AOL message  Send vealj an ICQ Message  Click to see vealj's MSN Messenger address  Send vealj a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
I've searched all over the web and can find nothing about a lawsuit by this woman.

In 1959 the Little Miss Coppertone GirlŪ was Cheri Brand whose mother, Joyce Brand, was a commercial illustrator. Her mother made a drawing from a photograph taken of 3 year old Cheri in their back yard. This drawing became the infamous billboard ad.

Jodie Foster got her start in a Coppertone TV commercial at age 6, however, she was not the one on the billboard ad nor did she go nude on the TV spots.

Take care and ...
Keep it Bare !!!
- veal
http://www.vealj.com/naturist.html



Country: USA | Posts: 285 Go to Top of Page

papabare
Forum Member


Posted - 04/28/2004 :  11:24:10 PM  Show Profile  Visit papabare's Homepage  Send papabare a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
I had heard that somewhere too Kim, not sure if it is Internet Urban Legend or not, but I thought I heard it on a news show.

--------------------
Live Body Proud, Live Clothes Free



Country: USA | Posts: 620 Go to Top of Page

Kimberly
Forum Member


Posted - 05/01/2004 :  07:37:02 AM  Show Profile  Send Kimberly a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
That is where I heard it, on a TV news show.

My mom has a set of baby pictures of my dad. There are four black and white 5" X 6" pictures in a frame. The pictures were made at a professional studio like Olan Mills. Two of the pictures show him lying on his tummy in the nude. The only vital parts you see is the pictures are the crack in his gluteus maximus. I belive he was six months old at the time. I think the pictures are cute and understand a lot of baby pictures were made like that back then, but I see nothing wrong with them. Evidently a lot of people went a lot further than that , so I guess thats why the clamp down of nude pictures of kids.

Kim =^.^=



Country: Canada | Posts: 3235 Go to Top of Page

papabare
Forum Member


Posted - 05/02/2004 :  9:23:31 PM  Show Profile  Visit papabare's Homepage  Send papabare a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
Its the way of society, the few bad apples in the bunch ruin the apple sauce. (Ok, that was a bad analogy, but I couldn't think of anything else )

I have seen pictures of my grandmother, my mother, and myself all like that Kim, the first two were proffesionally done, mine was my aunt (Who was a professional aswell, but wasnt done in studio). My aunt also had pictures of her kids being kids, she said she would laugh in thier face if they tried to lock her up for them :)

I dunno, I dont like the idea of jail

--------------------
Live Body Proud, Live Clothes Free



Country: USA | Posts: 620 Go to Top of Page

Kimberly
Forum Member


Posted - 05/03/2004 :  04:22:43 AM  Show Profile  Send Kimberly a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
There is a lot of child pornography on the net, a lot of pictures out of Eastern Europe, and the Orient. I guess our law makers can not dertermine which is porn (abuse for money), and what are just natural nudist pictures. But in order to be safe you just don't take nude pictures of your kids.

Kim =^.^=



Country: Canada | Posts: 3235 Go to Top of Page

bornnude
Forum Member


Posted - 05/03/2004 :  06:34:23 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It is easier for the lawmakers and enforcement when they don't have to make judgment calls. The problem is when it makes them or the public look just plain stupid.


Country: USA | Posts: 462 Go to Top of Page

Kimberly
Forum Member


Posted - 05/04/2004 :  03:22:42 AM  Show Profile  Send Kimberly a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
Bornnude they would just have to make it some way where it wasn't profitalbe for the people who deal in kiddie porn.

Kim =^.^=



Country: Canada | Posts: 3235 Go to Top of Page

bornnude
Forum Member


Posted - 05/04/2004 :  07:31:56 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Kimberly

Bornnude they would just have to make it some way where it wasn't profitalbe for the people who deal in kiddie porn.

Kim =^.^=



That is one of the arguments I have seen for legalization of drugs. Not sure how it would work for kiddie porn. I think I would not like seeing that legalized.



Country: USA | Posts: 462 Go to Top of Page

Kimberly
Forum Member


Posted - 05/05/2004 :  03:18:03 AM  Show Profile  Send Kimberly a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
No bornnude and I would not like to see it legalized either, but how do you curtail something like that without infringing on the rights of other people?

Kim =^.^=



Country: Canada | Posts: 3235 Go to Top of Page

The Bead Man
Forum Member


Posted - 05/05/2004 :  2:43:41 PM  Show Profile  Visit The Bead Man's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Kim,

The issue is probably not one of legalization, but of definition of the boundaries of acceptable behaviour.

The same pictures of (merely) naked children could be innocent to some people (e.g. their parents) and pornographic in intent to others (such as people trading them on the Internet). Although there is unfortunately a grey area in between, the law could easily exclude people taking pictures of their own family (or having them developed) for their own private use from prosecution. A minimal amount of training of photo shop staff (or at least the managers) would allow them to distinguish such innocent situations from, say, someone ordering 200 copies of staged naked photos.

Cheers!

David
"The Bead Man"
www.thebeadman.net

The Bead Artist formerly known as Revilo42



Country: | Posts: 186 Go to Top of Page

papabare
Forum Member


Posted - 05/05/2004 :  11:15:57 PM  Show Profile  Visit papabare's Homepage  Send papabare a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
They could have stick figure photo references.

"If they are posed like this, this, this, or THIS it is illegal, anything else is ok."

Or only hire nudists

I read a stat somewhere that there was less (reported) child abuse per capita in (I believe) Denmark/The Neatherlands then anywhere else while there was no ban on any pornography, animal, child, whatever. Not the kind of thing I would want happining here or anywhere else frankly, but it does make you wonder. It is the whole thing of the want of the 'Forbidden'. Maybe in the next few years, when computer graphics get even better, someone will market the idea of build your own porn, it can be whatever, no animals, humans, cadavers, aliens, or fairy tale creatues get exploited or harmed in the making of the porn and the people who would otherwise find a release with a non-fiction entity can be sated in the saftey (Our Saftey more then Thiers) of thier own home/hole/burrow/whatever.

That could mean the downfall of the adult entertainment industry as we know it, aswell as all the underground stuff aswell.

Me, I am gonna stick to real life women over the age of 20something

--------------------
Live Body Proud, Live Clothes Free



Country: USA | Posts: 620 Go to Top of Page

nudeboy
Forum Member


Posted - 05/06/2004 :  06:25:28 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
There is alot of controversy about nude pics of children,and its only right that children are protected as they are totally innocent little people.

I have taken pics of my two angels in the bath,the water covering them from the waist down.Probably every other parent has the same type of pics,including babies laying on their tummies with talcum powder on their little behinds.

These pics are good to bring out when the child grows up and can be shown to future son/daughter in-laws lol lol .


nudeboy..
because its how I was born



Country: | Posts: 98 Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic: out of a job after leading her fifth-grade classes Topic Next Topic: just starting nude and with children  
 New Topic |   Reply to Topic |   Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Jump To:
Nudist-Resorts.Org Discussion Forum Bulletin Board Nudism Clothing Optional Resort Naturism Nude Beaches © 2002-2020 SUN Go To Top Of Page
This page was down to skin in 0.25 seconds.

 

General Rules and Terms of Service

Membership in the Nudist-Resorts.Org discussion forum is free, can be anonymous, and requires only a working email address. All email links to members are cloaked. You can disable your email link. Nude photos can be posted, if within our posting rules. No erotica, spam or solicitation is allowed here. References to sex or genitals in your username or profile will result in removal from the forum. Information and opinions regarding anything related to nudism are encouraged, including discussions concerning the confusion between nudism and eroticism if discussed maturely. All posts in this forum are moderated. Read our POSTING RULES here and here. All information appearing on this website is copyright and intellectual property of the Society for Understanding Nudism unless otherwise noted. The views expressed on these forums by participants are not necessarily representative of the Society for Understanding Nudism. Administrators reserve the right to delete anything outside the posting rules, or anything in their opinion not appropriate. To post, you must have cookies enabled and be at least 18 years of age.

Email the Webmaster | Legal Information

Copyright © 2002-2015 SUN - Society for Understanding Nudism
All Rights Reserved

Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000